4.5 Article

The 5-HT2A receptor antagonist M100,907 prevents extracellular glutamate rising in response to NMDA receptor blockade in the mPFC

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 91, 期 1, 页码 189-199

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02704.x

关键词

CPP; glutamate; 5-HT2A receptors; M100; 907; medial prefrontal cortex; NMDA receptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We recently found that intracortical injection of the selective and competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist 3-(R)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) impaired attentional performance in rats and blockade of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(2A) receptors antagonized this effect. Here, we used the microdialysis technique in conscious rats to study the effect of CPP on extracellular glutamate (GLU) in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the regulation of this effect by 5-HT2A receptors. Intraperitoneal injection of 20 mg/kg CPP increased extracellular GLU in the mPFC (201% of basal levels) but had no effect on 5-HT. Intracortical infusion of 100 mum CPP increased extracellular GLU (230% of basal values) and 5-HT (150% of basal values) in the mPFC, whereas 30 mum had no significant effect. The effect of 100 mum CPP on extracellular GLU was abolished by tetrodotoxin, suggesting that neuronal activity is required. Subcutaneous injection of 40 mug/kg M100,907 completely antagonized the effect of 100 mum cpp on extracellular GLU, whereas 10 mug/kg caused only partial attenuation. Likewise, intracortical infusion of 0.1 mum M100,907 completely reversed the increase of extracellular GLU induced by CPP. These findings show that blockade of NMDA receptors in the mPFC is sufficient to increase extracellular GLU locally. The increase of cortical extracellular GLU may contribute to CPP-induced cognitive deficits and blockade of 5-HT2A receptors may provide a molecular mechanism for reversing these deficits caused by dysfunctional glutamatergic transmission in the mPFC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据