4.6 Review

Hairpin structure-forming propensity of the (CCTG•CAGG) tetranucleotide repeats contributes to the genetic instability associated with myotonic dystrophy type 2

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 40, 页码 41715-41726

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M406415200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES11347] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS35870, NS37554] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic instabilities of (CCTG.CAGG)(n) tetranucleotide repeats were investigated to evaluate the molecular mechanisms responsible for the massive expansions found in myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) patients. DM2 is caused by an expansion of the repeat from the normal allele of 26 to as many as 11,000 repeats. Genetic expansions and deletions were monitored in an African green monkey kidney cell culture system (COS-7 cells) as a function of the length (30, 114, or 200 repeats), orientation, or proximity of the repeat tracts to the origin (SV40) of replication. As found for CTG.CAG repeats related to DM1, the instabilities were greater for the longer tetranucleotide repeat tracts. Also, the expansions and deletions predominated when cloned in orientation II (CAGG on the leading strand template) rather than I and when cloned proximal rather than distal to the replication origin. Biochemical studies on synthetic d(CAGG)(26) and d( CCTG)(26) as models of unpaired regions of the replication fork revealed that d(CAGG)(26) has a marked propensity to adopt a defined base paired hairpin structure, whereas the complementary d(CCTG)(26) lacks this capacity. The effect of orientation described above differs from all previous results with three triplet repeat sequences ( including CTG.CAG), which are also involved in the etiologies of other hereditary neurological diseases. However, similar to the triplet repeat sequences, the ability of one of the two strands to form a more stable folded structure, in our case the CAGG strand, explains this unorthodox reversed behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据