4.4 Article

Adenosine receptors control HIV-1 Tat-induced inflammatory responses through protein phosphatase

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 327, 期 2, 页码 186-195

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.07.007

关键词

monocytes/macrophages; immunodeficiency diseases; cytokines; cellular activation; signal transduction

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, adenosine has been proposed to be a metabolic switch that may sense and direct immune and inflammatory responses. Inflammation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production are important in development of HIV-1 associated dementia, a devastating consequence of HIV-1 infection of the CNS. The HIV-1 protein Tat induces cell death in the CNS and activates local inflammatory responses partially by inducing calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum. Because activation of adenosine receptors decreases production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha in several experimental paradigms both in vitro and in vivo, we hypothesized that adenosine receptor activation would control both increased intracellular calcium and TNF-alpha production induced by Tat. Treatment of primary monocytes with Tat significantly increased the levels of intracellular calcium released from IP3 stores. Activation of adenosine receptors with CGS 21680 inhibited Tat-induced increases of intracellular calcium by 90 +/- 8% and was dependent on protein phosphatase activity because okadaic acid blocked the actions of CGS 21680. Tat-induced TNF-alpha production was inhibited 90 +/- 6% by CGS 21680 and concurrent treatment with okadaic acid blocked the inhibitory actions of CGS 21680. Using a model monocytic cell line, CGS 21680 treatment increased cytosolic serine/threonine phosphatase. Together, these data indicate that A(2A) receptor activation increases protein phosphatase activity, which blocks IP3 receptor-regulated calcium release and reduction of intracellular calcium inhibits TNF-alpha production in monocytes. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据