4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Growth of bismuth tri-iodine platelets for room temperature X-ray detection

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 2461-2465

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2004.836144

关键词

bismuth tri-iodide; BiI3; X-ray detectors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bismuth tri-iodide synthesized from bismuth subcarbonate and potassium iodide, and then purified by zone refining followed by one sublimation, was used as starting material. A first set of platelets was grown by physical vapor deposition (PVD) under argon atmosphere (7 X 10(4) Pa), with a source temperature of 300 degreesC and during 5-7 days. Growth temperature was at about 260 degreesC. Other set of platelets was grown by traveling molten zone (TMZ), at 460 degreesC and with a traveling speed of 5 mm/h. Platelets are up to 20 x 10 mm(2) in size and from 50 to 80 mum in thickness. Dendritic-like defects turned out to be the main surface defect for the PVD crystals. Some samples exhibit hexagonal microcrystals on their surface, which indicates that they grow from layers of hexagonal grains. Detectors were made with representative platelets by Pd or An thermal deposition (contact areas of 0.03,0.02,0.12 cm(2)), Pd wire attachment with aquadag and acrylic encapsulation. TMZ crystals show a better surface crystal quality, but this fact does not seam to particularly influence the detector electrical properties. However, the metal used for electrode deposition determines the resistivity, and An emerges as better than Pd for this purpose. Detector X-ray response was measured by irradiation with a Am-241 source of 3.5 mR/h. Resistivities up to 2.0 x 10(12) Omega . cm were obtained, the best reported for detectors made with monocrystals of this material, which correlates with the fact that these detectors are the first BiI3 ones that respond to an X-ray moderate radiation exposure. Platelets obtained in the present work give detector but not spectrometric grade material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据