4.3 Article

Identification of lectin-like receptors expressed by antigen presenting cells and neutrophils and their mapping to a novel gene complex

期刊

IMMUNOGENETICS
卷 56, 期 7, 页码 506-517

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-004-0714-x

关键词

antigen presenting cells; lectin-like receptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an experimental rat model, we recently mapped an arthritis susceptibility locus to the distal part of Chromosome 4 containing genes predicted to encode C-type lectin superfamily (CLSF) receptors. Here we report the cDNA cloning and positional arrangement of these receptor genes, which represent rat orthologues to human Mincle and DCIR and to mouse MCL and Dectin-2, as well as four novel receptors DCIR2, DCIR3, DCIR4 and DCAR1, not previously reported in other species. We furthermore report the cDNA cloning of human Dectin-2 and MCL, and of the mouse orthologues to the novel rat receptors. Similar to the killer-cell lectin-like receptors (KLR) some of these receptors exhibit structural features suggesting that they regulate leukocyte reactivity; e.g., human DCIR and rodent DCIR1 and DCIR2 carry an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM), predicting inhibitory function, and conversely, in all three species Mincle has a positively charged amino acid in the transmembrane region, suggesting activating function. Sequence comparisons show that the receptors form a discrete family, more closely related to group II CLSF receptors than to the group V KLR. Their distance to the KLR is underscored by their preservation of evolutionary conserved calcium/saccharide binding residues, present in group II and lacking in group V CLSF and their cellular expression patterns, with most of the genes preferentially expressed by professional antigen-presenting cells (dendritic cells, macrophages and B cells) and neutrophils. In all three species, the genes map together, forming an evolutionary conserved gene complex, which we call the antigen presenting lectin-like receptor complex (APLEC).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据