4.5 Article

Social variables predict between-subject but not day-to-day variation in the testosterone of US men

期刊

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 1153-1162

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.01.008

关键词

testosterone; marriage; fatherhood; mating effort; evolution; circadian rhythm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous research has shown lower testosterone (T) levels associated with involvement in committed, romantic relationships (paired men) and paternal care in eight studies of North American men. An unanswered question is whether differences in mate T levels associated with relationship status better reflect state (e.g., a man has lower T levels because he is involved in a relationship) or trait (e.g., low T men are more inclined toward such relationships) effects. Toward addressing this question, this paper presents data on mate salivary T levels among a sample of 65 men varying in marital and parental status. Subjects collected saliva samples (at approximately waking, 17:00 and 21:00 h) and filled out questionnaires concerning their activities on four days. Each subject collected samples in two settings that varied in social interactions: for unmarried men, two working and two non-working days; for married non-fathers, two days spent mostly with their wives and two days spent mostly away from their wives; and for married fathers, two days spent mostly with their young children and two days spent mostly away from their children. Analyses revealed no significant within-subject T differences between these different conditions. However, between-group analyses revealed that married men had lower evening T levels than unmarried men, corroborating existing North American studies of mate T and relationship status. These results suggest that day-to-day differences in social interactions may not be associated with differences in T levels, and tend further support to the growing body of evidence that hormone-behavior effect sizes may be greater in the afternoon and evening than in the morning. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据