4.6 Article

Cold weather and GP consultations for respiratory conditions by elderly people in 16 locations in the UK

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 959-968

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-004-5731-4

关键词

cold weather; primary care; time series

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cold weather is associated with increases in mortality and demands on hospital services in the UK, particularly by the elderly. Less is known about the relationship with patterns of consultation in primary care. We wished to determine the magnitude and consistency of associations between cold temperature and consultations for respiratory conditions in primary care settings at different sites in the UK. Methods: Time series analysis of any short-term effects of temperature on daily general practitioner ( GP) consultations made by elderly people (65+ years) for lower and upper respiratory tract infections (LRTI, URTI) over a 10-year period, 1992-2001. Practices were situated in 16 urban locations across the UK where a Met Office monitoring station was in operation. Results: An association between low temperatures and an increase in LRTI consultations was observed in all 16 locations studied. The biggest increase was estimated for the Norwich practices for which a 19.0% increase in LRTI consultations (95% CI 13.6, 24.7) was associated with every 1degreesC drop in mean temperature below 5degreesC observed 0-20 days before the day of consultation. Slightly weaker relationships were observed in the case of URTI consultations. A north/south gradient, with larger temperature effects in the north, was in evidence for both LRTI and URTI consultations. Conclusions: An effect that was consistent and generally strongest in populations in the north was observed between cold temperature and respiratory consultations. Better understanding of the mechanisms by which cold weather is associated with increases in consultations for respiratory infections could lead to improved strategies for prevention and reduced burdens for health services.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据