4.5 Article

Proteinase-activated receptor-2-mediated relaxation in mouse tracheal and bronchial smooth muscle: Signal transduction mechanisms and distinct agonist sensitivity

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.104.068387

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We characterized the tracheal and bronchial relaxation caused by proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) activation in ddY mice and/or in wild-type and PAR-2-knockout mice of C57BL/6 background. Ser-Leu-Ile-Gly-Arg-Leu-amide (SLIGRL-NH2) and Thr-Phe-Leu-Leu-Arg-amide, PAR-2- and PAR-1-activating peptides, respectively, caused relaxation in the isolated ddY mouse trachea and main bronchus. The relaxation was abolished by specific inhibitors of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1, COX-2, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), and p38 MAP kinase. The MEK and p38 MAP kinase inhibitors did not affect prostaglandin E-2-induced relaxation. Inhibitors of cytosolic Ca2+-dependent phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)), Ca2+-independent PLA(2), diacylglycerol lipase, tyrosine kinase, and protein kinase C exhibited no or only minor inhibitory effects on the PAR-mediated relaxation. Trypsin, a PAR-2 activator, and 2-furoyl-Leu-Ile-Gly-Arg-Leu-amide, a potent PAR-2- activating peptide, in addition to SLIGRL-NH2, caused airway relaxation in wild-type C57BL/6 mice, as in ddY mice. In PAR-2-knockout mice, the peptide effects were absent and the potency of trypsin decreased. Desensitization of PAR-2 and/or PAR-1-greatly suppressed the relaxant effect of trypsin. The bronchial and tracheal tissues displayed distinct sensitivities toward trypsin and the PAR-2-activating peptides. Our data indicate an involvement of both COX-1 and COX-2, and the MEK-extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 MAP kinase signaling pathways in the PAR-2- and PAR-1-triggered relaxation of mouse airway tissue, and substantiate a role for PAR-2 in regulating both the trachea and bronchial responsiveness in the mouse lung.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据