4.6 Article

Prospective evaluation of the effect of rotator cuff integrity on the outcome of open rotator cuff repairs

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1716-1722

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0363546504265262

关键词

rotator cuff; open repair; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); repair integrity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Open rotator cuff repairs have led to excellent clinical results; however, several studies have linked postoperative structural integrity to patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to prospectively assess postoperative cuff integrity after open rotator cuff repair and assess its relationship to clinical outcome. Hypothesis: Preoperative rotator cuff tear size and postoperative rotator cuff integrity are important factors in overall clinical outcomes. Study Design: Prospective nonrandomized clinical outcomes study. Methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients undergoing repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears by a single surgeon were enrolled in this prospective study. A standardized evaluation was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at annual intervals. All patients underwent postoperative magnetic resonance imaging at least 1 year after surgery. Statistical evaluation was performed using paired and unpaired 2-tailed t tests for comparison. Results: Thirty-two patients were available for evaluation. Overall, the patients experienced a significant (P <.05) improvement in their American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons survey (40-85) and Constant (53-80) scores. The overall retear rate was 31%. Although patients with large tears preoperatively and retears postoperatively had lower overall outcomes scores, this was not significant. Conclusion: These data support open rotator cuff repair as an effective technique that restores excellent shoulder function. The authors did not find postoperative cuff integrity to have a significant effect on outcomes when compared with those with an intact cuff. In fact, those with a retear still had a significant improvement in all clinical areas assessed, including strength.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据