4.5 Article

The controlled resorption of porous α-tricalcium phosphate using a hydroxypropylcellulose coating

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000046399.40310.47

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tricalcium phosphate (TCP) ceramic is known in orthopedics to be a bioresorbable bone substitute. A porous TCP ceramic body also has high potential as a drug delivery system in bony defects. Porous alpha-TCP ceramic can be easily fabricated using conventional sintering of beta-TCP, since alpha-TCP is the thermodynamically stable phase at temperatures above 1100degreesC. However, the solubility of alpha-TCP is much higher than that of beta-TCP. Therefore, the dissolution of porous alpha-TCP progresses at a higher rate than bone repair. In the present study, we attempted to reduce the dissolution rate of porous alpha-TCP by employing an organic polymer coating. We fabricated porous alpha-TCP ceramic with a continuous 10-50 mum diameter pore structure by sintering a body made from a beta-TCP and potato starch slurry. The porous body obtained was coated with hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), and then subjected to heat treatment. The chemical durability and mechanical properties of the body were examined before and after coating with the HPC. The dissolution of porous alpha-TCP in buffered solutions was reduced by coating with HPC and drying at 60degreesC. The compressive strength of the porous alpha-TCP was also improved by coating with HPC. The results of in vivo experiments showed that some parts of the porous alpha-TCP ceramic coated with HPC remained in the canal of the tibia of a rabbit four weeks after implantation, whereas no residual was observed in a non-coated alpha-TCP ceramic. Coating with HPC was found to be effective for controlling bioresorption and improving the workability of porous alpha-TCP ceramic. The prepared porous alpha-TCP ceramic is expected to be useful as a novel material for bone fillers by incorporating it with drugs or osteoinductive factors. (C) 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据