4.3 Article

Stabilizing the closed S6 gate in the Shaker Kv channel through modification of a hydrophobic seal

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 124, 期 4, 页码 319-332

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.200409098

关键词

voltage-dependent gating; closed gate; Agitoxin; mutagenesis; potassium channel

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [ZIA NS002945-13] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The primary activation gate in K+ channels is thought to reside near the intracellular entrance to the ion conduction pore. In a previous study of the S6 activation gate in Shaker (Hackos et al., 2002), we found that mutation of V478 to W results in a channel that cannot conduct ions even though the voltage sensors are competent to translocate gating charge in response to membrane depolarization. In the present study we explore the mechanism underlying the nonconducting phenotype in V478W and compare it to that of W434F, a mutation located in ail extracellular region of the pore that is nonconducting because the channel is predominant]), found in an inactivated state. We began by examining whether the intracellular gate moves using probes that interact with the intracellular pore and by studying the inactivation properties of heterodimeric channels that are competent to conduct ions. The results of these experiments support distinct mechanisms underlying nonconduction in W434F and V478W, suggesting that the gate in V478W either remains closed, or that the Mutation has created a large barrier to ion permeation in the open state. Single channel recordings for heterodimeric and double mutant constructs in which ion conduction is rescued suggest that the V478W mutation does not dramatically alter unitary conductance. Taken together, our results suggest that the V478W mutation causes a profound shift of the closed to open equilibrium toward the closed state. This mechanism is discussed in the context of the structure of this critical region in K+ channels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据