4.7 Article

Activity of capuramycin analogues against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare in vitro and in vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 54, 期 4, 页码 755-760

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh417

关键词

mycobacteria; antimycobacterials; translocase I; peptidoglycan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The antimycobacterial activities of RS-112997, RS-124922 and RS-118641, three capuramycin analogues that inhibit phospho-N-acetylmuramyl-pentapeptide translocase, were tested against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare. Methods and results: MICs were determined by the broth microdilution method using a modified Middlebrook 7H9 broth. RS-118641 was the most potent compound overall. The MIC50/90 (mg/L) results for RS-118641 were: M. tuberculosis, 1/2; multidrug-resistant (MDR) M. tuberculosis, 0.5/2; M. avium, 4/8; and M. intracellulare, 0.06/0.5. No statistically significant differences in MIC distributions were observed between non-MDR and MDR M. tuberculosis for any of the capuramycin analogues tested. In order to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of RS-112997 and RS-124922 in a murine lung model of tuberculosis, both compounds were administered intranasally at 0.1 or 1 mg/mouse/day for 12 days. The mycobacterial load in the lungs was significantly lower in all treatment groups than in the untreated controls. Additional experiments were performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the three compounds against the M. intracellulare infection in mice. All compounds were administered intranasally at 0.1 mg/mouse/day for 21 days. The mycobacterial load in the lungs was significantly lower in all treatment groups than in the untreated controls. Conclusions: These results suggest that capuramycin analogues exhibit strong antimycobacterial potential and should be considered for further evaluation in the treatment of M. tuberculosis and M. avium-M. intracellulare complex infections in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据