4.6 Article

Probing galaxy evolution through the internal colour gradients, the Kormendy relations and the Photometric Plane of cluster galaxies at z ∼ 0.2

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 425, 期 3, 页码 797-812

出版社

E D P SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20047157

关键词

galaxies : clusters : individual : A 2163B; galaxies : photometry; galaxies : fundamental parameters; galaxies : evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a detailed analysis of the photometric properties of galaxies in the cluster A 2163B at redshift zsimilar to0.2. R-, I- and K-band structural parameters, (half light radius R-e, mean surface brightness (e) within R-e and Sersic index n) are derived for Nsimilar to60 galaxies, and are used to study their internal colour gradients. For the first time, we use the slopes of optical-NIR Kormendy relations to study colour gradients as a function of galaxy size, and we derive the Photometric Plane at zsimilar to0.2 in the K band. Colour gradients are negligible at optical wavelengths, and are negative in the optical-NIR, amounting on average to -0.48+/-0.06. This result is in agreement with our previous measurements of colour gradients at intermediate redshifts, and imply a metallicity gradient in galaxies of similar to0.2 dex per radial decade. The analysis of the Kormendy relation suggests that its slope increases from the optical to the NIR, implying that colour gradients do not vary or even do become less steep in more massive galaxies. Such a result is not simply accomodated within a monolithic collapse scenario, while it can be well understood within a hierarchical merging framework. Finally, we derive the first NIR Photometric Plane at zsimilar to0.2, accounting for both the correlations on the measurement uncertainties and the selection effects. The Photometric Plane at zsimilar to0.2 is consistent with that at zsimilar to0, with an intrinsic scatter significantly smaller than the Kormendy relation but larger than the Fundamental Plane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据