4.4 Article

Response properties of whisker-related neurons in rat second somatosensory cortex

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 92, 期 4, 页码 2083-2092

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00262.2004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS031078-12, NS-31078, R01 NS051799-01A1, R01 NS031078, R01 NS051799] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to a primary somatosensory cortex ( SI), the cerebral cortex of all mammals contains a second somatosensory area (SII); however, the functions of SII are largely unknown. Our aim was to explore the functions of SII by comparing response properties of whisker-related neurons in this area with their counterparts in the SI. We obtained extracellular unit recordings from narcotized rats, in response to whisker deflections evoked by a piezoelectric device, and compared response properties of SI barrel ( layer IV) neurons with those of SII ( layers II to VI) neurons. Neurons in both cortical areas have similar response latencies and spontaneous activity levels. However, SI and SII neurons differ in several significant properties. The receptive fields of SII neurons are at least five times as large as those of barrel neurons, and they respond equally strongly to several principal whiskers. The response magnitude of SII neurons is significantly smaller than that of neurons in SI, and SII neurons are more selective for the angle of whisker deflection. Furthermore, whereas in SI fast-spiking ( inhibitory) and regular-spiking ( excitatory) units have different spontaneous and evoked activity levels and differ in their responses to stimulus onset and offset, SII neurons do not show significant differences in these properties. The response properties of SII neurons suggest that they are driven by thalamic inputs that are part of the paralemniscal system. Thus whisker-related inputs are processed in parallel by a lemniscal system involving SI and a paralemniscal system that processes complimentary aspects of somatosensation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据