4.0 Article

Effects of bifidobacterium breve supplementation on intestinal flora of low birth weight infants

期刊

PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 509-515

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.2004.01953.x

关键词

antibiotics; Bifidobacterium breve; intestinal flora; low birth weight infant; nectrotizing enterocolitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It is known that the bifidobacteria flora play important roles in mucosal host defense and can prevent infectious diseases. Because bacterial populations develop during the first day of life, the authors examined whether the early administration of bifidobacteria has a positive effect on the health of low birth weight infants. Methods: The effects of oral administration of Bifidobacterium breve (B. breve) supplements were studied in a controlled trial with low birth weight infants (average birth weight 1489 g). The infants were divided into three groups: Group A and B received a dose of 1.6 x 10(8) cells of B. breve supplement twice a day, commencing either from several hours after birth (group A) or 24 h after birth (group B). Group C, the control group, received no supplement. Results: There were no significant differences in birth weight, treatment with antibiotics, and the starting time of breast-feeding among the three groups. A Bifidobacterium-predominant flora was formed at an average of 2 weeks after birth in group A and at an average of 4 weeks after birth in group B, while no Bifidobacterium was isolated in eight out of 10 infants in group C during the observation period of 7 weeks. In comparison between group A and B, Bifidobacterium was detected significantly earlier in group A, and the number of Enterobacteriaceae present in the infants at 2 weeks after birth was significantly lower in group A. Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest that very early administration of B. breve to low birth weight infants is useful in promoting the colonization of the Bifidobacterium and the formation of a normal intestinal flora.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据