4.5 Article

Detection of a dural defect by cinematic magnetic resonance imaging and its selective closure as a treatment for a spinal extradural arachnoid cyst

期刊

SPINE
卷 29, 期 19, 页码 E426-E430

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000141189.41705.70

关键词

arachnoid cyst; meningeal cyst; extradural; cine-MRI; minimally invasive treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Design. We document a giant spinal extradural arachnoid cyst treated by selective closure of the dural defect. It was diagnosed using cinematic magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). Objective. To demonstrate the effectiveness of selective closure of the dural defect as a treatment for a spinal extradural arachnoid cyst. Summary of Background Data. The standard treatment for a spinal extradural arachnoid cyst is total resection of the cyst wall, if possible, and the closure of the communication site, if any, between the cyst and the subarachnoid space, after an extensive laminectomy. To our knowledge, selective closure of the dural defect through minimal laminotomy with little cyst resection has not been reported. Methods. A 29-year-old woman presented with right leg muscle weakness and was diagnosed with an extradural arachnoid cyst ranging from spinal regions T11 to L3 using MRI. Myelography demonstrated that the cyst communicated with the subarachnoid space. Cine-MRI showed a pulsating flow voiding on the left side of level L1, suggesting the location of the communication site. Fenestration of the T12-L1 region was performed, preserving the spinous processes and the facet joints. A small dural rent was found on the left side of level L1. This was closed using small clips. Results. MRI 12 days later demonstrated that the cyst had shrunk dramatically. It had disappeared completely by 4 months. The patient's muscle weakness improved gradually, and she was almost complaint-free 6 months after the operation. Conclusions. Selective closure of the dural defect based on cine-MRI will be useful for treating extradural arachnoid cysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据