4.7 Article

Screening for serum total homocysteine in newborn children

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 10, 页码 1769-1784

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.036194

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Newborn screening for total homocysteine (tHcy) in blood may identify babies with vitamin B-12 (B-12) deficiency or homocystinuria, but data on the causes of increased tHcy in screening samples are sparse. Methods: Serum concentrations of tHcy, cystathionine, methionine, folate, and B-12 and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C>T polymorphism were determined in 4992 capillary blood samples collected as part of the routine screening program in newborn children. Methylmalonic acid (MMA), gender (SRY genotyping), and the frequency of six cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) mutations were determined in 20-27% of the samples, including all samples with tHcy >15 mumol/L (n = 127), B-12 <100 pmol/L (n = 159), or methionine >40 mumol/L (n = 154). Results: The median (5th-95th percentile) tHcy concentration was 6.8 (4.2-12.8) mumol/L. B-12 status, as determined by serum concentrations of B-12, tHcy, and MMA, was moderately better in boys than in girls. tHcy concentrations between 10 and 20 mumol/L were often associated with low B-12, whereas tHcy >20 mumol/L (n = 43) was nearly always explained by increased methionine. tHcy did not differ according to folate concentrations or MTHFR 677C>T genotypes. None of the babies had definite CBS deficiencies, but heterozygosity led to low cystathionine, increased methionine, but normal tHcy concentrations. Conclusion: Increased tHcy is a common but not specific finding in newborns. The metabolite and vitamin profiles will point to the cause of hyperhomocysteinemia. Screening for tHcy and related factors should be further evaluated in regions with high prevalence of homocystinuria and in babies at high risk of B,, deficiency. (C) 2004 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据