3.8 Article

A kinetic study of sugarcane sucrose synthase

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 271, 期 20, 页码 3971-3977

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04288.x

关键词

metabolic control analysis; sugarcane; sucrose synthase; kinetic modelling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kinetic data on sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) sucrose synthase (SuSy, UDP-glucose: D-fructose 2-alpha-D-glucosyltransferase, EC 2.4.1.13) are limited. We characterized kinetically a SuSy activity partially purified from sugarcane variety N19 leaf roll tissue. Primary plot analysis and product inhibition studies showed that a compulsory order ternary complex mechanism is followed, with UDP binding first and UDP-glucose dissociating last from the enzyme. Product inhibition studies showed that UDP-glucose is a competitive inhibitor with respect to UDP and a mixed inhibitor with respect to sucrose. Fructose is a mixed inhibitor with regard to both sucrose and UDP. Kinetic constants are as follows: K-m values (mM, +/- SE) were, for sucrose, 35.9 +/- 2.3; for UDP, 0.00191 +/- 0.00019; for UDP-glucose, 0.234 +/- 0.025 and for fructose, 6.49 +/- 0.61. K-i(s) values were, for sucrose, 227 mM; for UDP, 0.086 mM; for UDP-glucose, 0.104; and for fructose, 2.23 mM. Replacing estimated kinetic parameters of SuSy in a kinetic model of sucrose accumulation with experimentally determined parameters of the partially purified isoform had significant effects on model outputs, with a 41% increase in sucrose concentration and 7.5-fold reduction in fructose the most notable. Of the metabolites included in the model, fructose concentration was most affected by changes in SuSy activity: doubling and halving of SuSy activity reduced and increased the steady-state fructose concentration by about 42 and 140%, respectively. It is concluded that different isoforms of SuSy could have significant differential effects on metabolite concentrations in vivo, therefore impacting on metabolic regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据