4.5 Article

Expression of glucose transporter 5 by microglia in human gliomas

期刊

NEUROPATHOLOGY AND APPLIED NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 447-455

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2004.00556.x

关键词

brain macrophages; glioma; glucose transporter; immunohistochemistry; MHC class II; microglia; scavenger receptor class A

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our previous studies indicate that glucose transporter 5 (GLUT5) is a microglial marker in routine paraffin sections, and is rarely present in monocytes/macrophages of the peripheral organs. We examined the expression of GLUT5 in 91 cases of human gliomas to characterize the microglial phenotype in glioma tissues. Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections using such antibodies as a GLUT5 antibody, two markers for activated microglia: major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II Ag and macrophage scavenger receptor class A (MSR-A), and MIB-1 antibody. The immunoreactivity of GLUT5 was present in three microglial phenotypes: ramified (resting), activated, and ameboid (macrophagic) microglia in most of the cases. A double-labelling study of astrocytic tumours using GLUT5 and MIB-1 antibodies demonstrated a proportion of proliferating microglia. However, no morphological difference between MIB-1-positive, microglial cells and MIB-1-negative, microglial cells was found. The number of GLUT5-positive microglia was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in astrocytic tumours than in oligodendroglial tumours. Many GLUT5-positive microglia (up to 52% in total cells) were often observed in pilocytic astrocytomas, where microglial cells were predominantly ramified, and the number of MHC class II- or MSR-A-positive microglia was less than GLUT5-positive microglia. Thus, the present study indicated that intrinsic microglia can be a source of microglia/macrophages cell populations in astrocytic tumours, and that pilocytic astrocytomas often have a high proportion of microglial cells with mild activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据