4.6 Article

The effect of estrogen on ovine anterior cruciate ligament fibroblasts - Cell proliferation and collagen synthesis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1613-1618

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0363546503262179

关键词

estrogen; collagen synthesis; anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); cell proliferation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estrogen has been implicated as a causal factor for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in women. Studies have demonstrated a decrease in anterior cruciate ligament fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis at supraphysiologic levels of estrogen in a rabbit model. Hypothesis: The authors hypothesized that physiologic levels of estrogen would have no significant effect on anterior cruciate ligament fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis in an ovine model. Methods: Anterior cruciate ligament fibroblasts were isolated from sheep knees using routine cell culture methods. The cells were exposed to 17beta-estradiol at physiologic concentrations of 2.2, 5, 15, 25, 250, and 2500 pg/ml. Cell proliferation was determined by cell counts on days 4 and 6. Collagen synthesis was determined by H-3-proline incorporation on day 4. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect estrogen receptors. Results: Immunohistochemistry demonstrated the presence of estrogen receptors in ovine anterior cruciate ligament fibroblasts. There was no significant difference in anterior cruciate ligament fibroblast proliferation or collagen synthesis regardless of 17beta-estradiol concentration. Conclusions: Based on results of this study, and given the low turnover of collagen in ligaments, it is unlikely that a 2- to 3-day per month increase in circulating estrogen would result in rapid, clinically significant alterations in material properties of the anterior cruciate ligament in vivo. The etiology of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries is complex and multifactorial in nature, meriting further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据