4.2 Article

Providing health care to low-income women: a matter of trust

期刊

FAMILY PRACTICE
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 484-491

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmh503

关键词

low-income women; minority women; patient trust; prenatal care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Trust is an important indicator of quality in patient-provider relationships and predicts adherence to certain protective health behaviours. It has been relatively unexplored among low-income or minority women. Objectives. We explored health care experiences that influence patient trust among low-income women in the USA with respect to professionals and lay health workers (LHWs). Methods. Focus groups were conducted with 33 prenatal and postpartum women, aged 18-45 years, recruited from community-based public prenatal care programmes. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by readers. A model of factors associated with trust was developed based on the major thematic categories. Results. Most women were Black (67%) and had completed high school (85%). Factors related to greater trust specific to patient-provider relationships were: continuity of the patient-provider relationship, effective communication, demonstration of caring and perceived competence. Women with less trust in their physicians reported an unwillingness to follow his/her advice. Most women reported having more trusting relationships with LHWs and nurses than with physicians, probably due to greater contact with these staff. Several women with a low level of trust reported experiences of discrimination due to lack of insurance. Conclusions. Prenatal care presents a unique opportunity for providers to contribute to the elimination of health disparities among low-income women. Improving continuity with public health prenatal care providers and building strong relationships with LHWs may enhance quality of care and contribute to achieving this goal. Better patient-provider communication is also a practical area of focus towards improving patient trust.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据