4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Vitamin A deficiency increases the in vivo development of IL-10-positive Th2 cells and decreases development of Th1 cells in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 134, 期 10, 页码 2660-2666

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/134.10.2660

关键词

rodent; Th1/Th2; immunomodulators; transgenic/knockout; vitamin A deficiency

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [1 R01 AI 50863] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin A deficiency impairs both T helper type 1 (Th1)- and type 2 (Th2)-mediated immune responses, although Th2 responses seem to be principally affected. Multiple mechanisms are involved in this immune suppression, but the hypothesis that deficiency affects development of Th1/Th2 memory cell phenotype has not been tested directly in vivo. To do so, lymphocytes from DO11.10 T cell receptor (TCR)-transgenic mice were transferred to vitamin A-deficient or control BALB/c recipients. Recipients were then immunized with the cognate peptide antigen for the TCR-transgenic D011.10 T cells (OVA(323-339)). After 2-5 wk, the transferred OVA(323-339)-Specific T cells were identified from draining lymph nodes with the TCR-clonotypic antibody KJ1-26, and their Th1/Th2 phenotype was characterized by intracellular cytokine staining after in vitro stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate and ionomycin. The percentage of CD4(+)KJ1-26(+) cells positive for IL-10 was 100% greater in vitamin A-deficient mice (3.49 +/- 0.41%; mean +/- SE) than in control mice (1.74 +/- 0.37%). IL-4 did not differ between groups. In addition, the percentages of CD4(+)KJ1-26(+) cells from vitamin A-deficient mice that were positive for interferon (IFN)-gamma (8.8 +/- 0.73%) and interleukin (IL)-2 (39.5 +/- 3.1%) were both lower than the percentages in control mice (11.4 +/- 0.67 and 47.0 +/- 2.8%, respectively). Thus vitamin A deficiency, at the time of initial antigen exposure, enhances the development of IL-10-producing Th2 or T regulatory cells and diminishes the development of Th1 memory cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据