4.4 Article

Analysis of somatic APC mutations in rare extracolonic tumors of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli

期刊

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 93-98

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20071

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP) carry heterozygous mutations of the APC gene. At a young age, these patients develop multiple colorectal adenomas that consistently display a second somatic mutation in the remaining APC wild-type allele. Inactivation of APC leads to impaired degradation of beta-catenin, thereby promoting continuous cell-cycle progression. The role of APC inactivation in rare extracolonic tumors of FAP patients has not been characterized sufficiently. Among tissue specimen from 174 patients with known APC germ-line mutations, we identified 8 tumors infrequently seen in FAR To investigate the pathogenic role of APC pathway deregulation in these lesions, they were analyzed for second-hit somatic mutations in the mutational cluster region of the APC gene. Immunohistochemistry was performed to compare the expression pattern of P-catenin to the mutational status of the APC gene. Exon 3 of the beta-catenin gene (CTNNB1) was analyzed for activating mutations to investigate alternative mechanisms of elevated beta-catenin concentration. Although CTNNB1 mutations were not observed, second somatic APC mutations were found in 4 of the 8 tumors: a uterine adenocarcinoma, a hepatocellular adenoma, an adrenocortical adenoma, and an epidermal cyst. These tumors showed an elevated concentration of beta-catenin. No APC mutations were seen in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver, angiofibrolipoma, and seborrheic wart. This is the first study reporting second somatic APC mutations in FAP-associated uterine adenocarcinoma and epidermal cysts. Furthermore, our data strengthen a role for impaired APC function in the pathogenesis of adrenal and hepatic neoplasms in FAP patients. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据