3.9 Article

The risk of development of antimicrobial resistance in individual patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

期刊

ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
卷 130, 期 10, 页码 1201-1204

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.130.10.1201

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine if individual patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) demonstrate an increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance over time. Patients: A prospectively maintained database of microbiologic culture results for adult patients with CRS was sequentially analyzed, extracting patients who underwent multiple serial sinus cultures over time. Antimicrobial resistance patterns were identified and quantified for each bacterium. Sequential culture results were compared for individual patients to determine if increasing overall bacterial resistance, gram-positive resistance, gram-negative resistance, or a shift toward gram-negative organisms was manifested within individual patients. Results: During a 7-year period, 90 adult patients were identified with 224 serial cultures (mean, 2.5 cultures per patient) obtained, with a median time between cultures of 157 days. Four hundred twenty-nine organisms were isolated from these serial cultures, consisting of 255 gram-positive organisms, 120 gram-negative organisms, 48 anaerobes, and 6 fungi. Pairwise analysis of sequential cultures revealed no significant trend toward increasing bacterial resistance within individual patients (P = .57, runs test). Similarly, no significant trend toward increasing gram-positive or gram-negative resistance was demonstrated. There was no shift toward gram-negative organisms (P>. 15 for all). Conclusions: Individual patients with CRS do not necessarily develop increasing levels of bacterial resistance over time. The use of culture-directed antimicrobial therapy may protect against the development of sequentially increasing antimicrobial resistance for patients with CRS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据