4.7 Article

A missense variation in human casein kinase I epsilon gene that induces functional alteration and shows an inverse association with circadian rhythm sleep disorders

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 1901-1909

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300503

关键词

casein kinase; polymorphism; single nucleotide; phosphorylation; biological clocks; case-control studies; risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown that functional variations in clock genes, which generate circadian rhythms through interactive positive/ negative feedback loops, contribute to the development of circadian rhythm sleep disorders in humans. Another potential candidate for rhythm disorder susceptibility is casein kinase I epsilon (CKIepsilon), which phosphorylates clock proteins and plays a pivotal role in the circadian clock. To determine whether variations in CKIe induce vulnerability to human circadian rhythm sleep disorders, such as delayed sleep phase syndrome (DSPS) and non-24-hsleep-wake syndrome (N-24), we analyzed all of the coding exons of the human CKIe gene. One of the variants identified encoded an amino-acid substitution S408N, eliminating one of the putative autophosphorylation sites in the carboxyl-terminal extension of CKIepsilon. The N408 allele was less common in both DSPS ( p = 0.028) and N-24 patients ( p = 0.035) compared to controls. When DSPS and N-24 subjects were combined, based on an a priori prediction of a common mechanism underlying both DSPS and N-24, the inverse association between the N408 allele and rhythm disorders was highly significant ( p = 0.0067, odds ratio = 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.22 - 0.79). In vitro kinase assay revealed that CKIe with the S408N variation was similar to1.8-fold more active than wild-type CKIepsilon. These results indicate that the N408 allele in CKIe plays a protective role in the development of DSPS and N-24 through alteration of the enzyme activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据