4.7 Article

Immune cell toll-like receptor 4 is required for cardiac myocyte impairment during endotoxemia

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 95, 期 7, 页码 700-707

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000144175.70140.8c

关键词

inflammation; sepsis; neutrophils; heart; contractility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the importance of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling on cardiac myocytes versus immune cells in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced cardiac dysfunction. Cardiac myocytes isolated from LPS-treated C57Bl/6 mice showed reduced shortening and calcium transients as compared with myocytes from untreated mice. In addition, LPS-treated C57Bl/6 mice showed impaired cardiac mitochondrial function, including reduced respiration and reduced time of induction of permeability transition. All of the aforementioned cardiac dysfunction was dependent on TLR4, because LPS-treated TLR4-deficient mice did not have reduced myocyte shortening or mitochondrial dysfunction. To evaluate the role of cardiac myocyte versus leukocyte TLR4, LPS was injected into chimeric mice with TLR4-positive leukocytes and TLR4-deficient myocytes. These mice showed reduced myocyte shortening in response to LPS. Myocytes from chimeric mice with TLR4-deficient leukocytes and TLR4-positive myocytes had no response to LPS. In addition, isolated myocytes from C57Bl/6 mice subsequently treated with LPS and serum for various times did not have reduced shortening, despite the presence of TLR4 mRNA and protein, as determined by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and fluorescent-activated cell sorting. In fact, cardiac myocytes had equivalent amounts of TLR4 as endothelium; however, only the latter is responsive to LPS. Furthermore, signaling pathways downstream of TLR4 were not activated during direct LPS treatment of myocytes. In conclusion, TLR4 on leukocytes, and not on cardiac myocytes, is important for cardiac myocyte impairment during endotoxemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据