4.6 Article

An increased polymeric IgA level is not a prognostic marker for progressive IgA nephropathy

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 2487-2493

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfh394

关键词

CD89; IgA nephropathy; immunoglobulin A; macromolecular IgA; polymeric IgA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Elution of IgA from renal biopsies of patients with primary IgA nephropathy (IgAN) has suggested that mesangial IgA deposits are mainly multimeric in nature. This macromolecular IgA consists of dimeric and polymeric IgA and may be derived from the circulation. In children with IgAN, circulating macromolecular IgA levels correlate with bouts of macroscopic haematuria, but in adults a correlation with disease activity is less clear. Therefore, we have designed a novel method to assess the levels of polymeric IgA (pIgA) in sera from patients and controls. Methods. A novel precipitation assay using recombinant CD89 was developed to measure pIgA. Polymeric IgA levels were measured in serum samples obtained from healthy volunteers (n=21) and patients with IgAN (n=51). Subsequently, serum pIgA levels were correlated with clinical parameters of disease. Results. Serum pIgA levels were significantly increased in patients with IgAN. However, pIgA concentrations relative to total IgA were significantly lower in sera of patients with IgAN. No correlation was found between serum pIgA levels and clinical parameters of IgAN, such as decline of glomerular filtration rate, haematuria or proteinuria. Conclusions. Although absolute levels of serum pIgA are increased in patients with IgAN as compared with controls, levels of pIgA relative to total serum IgA are lower. No significant correlation was found between serum concentrations of pIgA and clinical parameters of disease. These data support the notion that it is not the size alone, but the physicochemical composition of the macromolecular IgA that is the key factor leading to mesangial deposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据