4.6 Article

Murine cytomegalovirus infection directs macrophage differentiation into a pro-inflammatory immune phenotype: implications for atherogenesis

期刊

MICROBES AND INFECTION
卷 6, 期 12, 页码 1056-1062

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.05.020

关键词

atherosclerosis; cytomegalovirus; macrophages; inflammation; immune activation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously demonstrated that mouse cytomegalovirus (MCMV) aggravates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout (apoE(-/-)) mice, most likely by enhancing both systemic and local (e.g. in the vascular wall) cytokine production. However, until now it was unclear which cell type is responsible for this enhanced pro-inflammatory cytokine production. In this study we focused on the macrophage (m Phi), which besides being an important source of such cytokines, is known to be an important player in both atherosclerosis and viral clearance. We investigated whether MCMV could induce a pro-inflammatory immune m Phi phenotype, which ultimately may contribute to the development of atherosclerosis. To this end, peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) were elicited in apoE(-/-) mice by either MCMV or thioglycolate injection, and m Phi were phenotyped at 1 week post-intraperitoneal injection. MCMV-induced peritoneal m Phi contained MCMV DNA but had limited MCMV mRNA expression, indicating latent infection. These m Phi showed increased production of interferon-gamma (IFN gamma), exclusive production of interleukin-18 (IL-18) and increased expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, CD40, CD80 and CD86, when compared with thioglycolate-induced m Phi. From these results, we conclude that intraperitoneal injection of MCMV induces an immune-responsive exudate in which at 7 days post-infection, MCMV-infected m Phi express a pro-inflammatory immune phenotype. As such, the MCMV-induced m Phi may be an important player in aggravating atherosclerosis through systemic and/or local immune activation. (c) 2004 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据