4.3 Article

Methanogenesis in McLean Bog, an acidic peat bog in upstate New York:: Stimulation by H2/CO2 in the presence of rifampicin, or by low concentrations of acetate

期刊

GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 433-443

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490450490505400

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acidic peat bog soils produce CH4 and although molecular biological studies have demonstrated the presence of diverse methano-genic populations in them, few studies have sustained methanogenesis by adding the CH4 precursors H-2/CO2 or acetate, and few indigenous methanogens have been cultured. McLean Bog is a small (ca. 70 m across), acidic (pH 3.4-4.3) Sphagnum-dominated bog in upstate New York. Although addition of H-2/CO2 or 10 mM acetate stimulated methanogenesis in soils from a nearby circumneutral-pH fen, neither of these substrates led to sustained methanogenesis in McLean Bog soil slurries. After a brief period of stimulation by H-2/CO2, methanogenesis in McLean Bog soil declined, which could be attributed to buildup of large amounts of acetic acid produced from the H-2/CO2 by acetogens. Addition of the antibiotic rifampicin inhibited acetogenesis (carried out by Bacteria) and allowed methanogenesis (carried out by Archaea) to continue. Using rifampicin, we were able to study effects of temperature, pH, and salts on methanogenesis from H-2/CO2 in McLean Bog soil samples. The enriched H-2/CO2-utilizing methanogens showed an optimum for activity near pH 5, and a temperature optimum near 35degreesC. Methanogenesis was not stimulated by addition of 10 mM acetate, but it was stimulated by 1 mM acetate, and multiple additions were consumed at increasing rates and nearly stoichiometrically converted to CH4. In conclusion, we have found that both hydrogentrophic and aceticlastic methanogens are present in McLean Bog soils, and that methanogenic activity can be stimulated using H-2/CO2 in the presence of rifampicin, or using low concentrations of acetate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据