4.7 Article

Colloidal adhesion to hydrophilic membrane surfaces

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 241, 期 2, 页码 235-248

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.04.036

关键词

fouling; reverse osmosis; thermodynamics; adhesion; AFM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colloidal adhesion to membrane surfaces is an important parameter in determining membrane fouling propensity and in optimizing membrane cleaning strategies. It has previously been demonstrated that acid-base interactions can significantly affect colloid-membrane interaction as a colloid approaches a membrane surface, however, the effect of acid-base interactions on adhesion has received less attention. In this investigation, the approach and adhesion of a silica and polystyrene colloid was measured on three commercially available hydrophilic water treatment membranes using an atomic force microscope and the colloid probe technique. It was found that the hydrophobic polystyrene colloid adhered more weakly to each membrane compared to the hydrophilic silica colloid. These results could not be resolved through classic DLVO analysis alone and were in direct contrast to the expected interaction based on the strong hydrophobic character of the polystyrene colloid. However, the results could be explained by considering the magnitude of the surface's electron-acceptor (gamma(+)) and electron-donor (gamma(-)) components. It is hypothesized that through hydrogen bonding with surface gamma(+) and gamma(-) groups, structured water layers exist to varying extents at the surfaces of the silica colloid and the hydrophilic membranes, and that their removal results in the formation of strong adhesive bonds between reciprocal gamma(+) and gamma(-) groups. Furthermore, even when surface roughness is substantial, gamma(+) and gamma(-) groups appear to play some role in determining the magnitude of the measured adhesion. The lack of such groups on the polystyrene colloid, and thus the lack of hydrogen bonding capacity, was responsible for its weaker adhesion with the membranes. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据