4.7 Article

Response of human islets to isolation stress and the effect of antioxidant treatment

期刊

DIABETES
卷 53, 期 10, 页码 2559-2568

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.53.10.2559

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01-DK-063335-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The process of human islet isolation triggers a cascade of stressful events in the islets of Langerhans involving activation of apoptosis and necrosis and the production of proinflammatory molecules that negatively influence islet yield and function and may produce detrimental effects after islet transplantation. In this study, we showed that activation of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), two of the major pathways responsible for cellular responses to stress, already occurs in pancreatic cells during the isolation procedure. NF-kappaB-dependent reactions, such as production and release of interleukin-6 and -8 and macrophage chemoattractant protein 1, were observed days after the isolation procedure in isolated purified islets. Under culture conditions specially designed to mimic isolation stress, islet proinflammatory responses were even more pronounced and correlated with higher islet cell loss and impaired secretory function. Here we present novel evidence that early interventions aimed at reducing oxidative stress of pancreatic cells and islets through the use of the catalytic antioxidant probe AEOL10150 (manganese [III] 5,10,15,20-tetrakis [1,3,-diethyl-2imidazoyl] manganese-porphyrin pentachloride [TDE-2,5-IP]) effectively reduces NF-kappaB binding to DNA, the release of cytokines and chemokines, and PARP activation in islet cells, resulting in higher survival and better insulin release. These findings support the concept that the isolation process predisposes islets to subsequent damage and functional impairment. Blocking oxidative stress can be beneficial in reducing islet vulnerability and can potentially have a significant impact on transplantation outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据