3.9 Article

Late holocene variability in Florida current surface density: Patterns and possible causes

期刊

PALEOCEANOGRAPHY
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2004PA001008

关键词

holocene; Florida current; density

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Planktonic foraminiferal delta(18)O time series from three well-dated, high sedimentation rate cores near the Florida Keys (24.4degreesN, 83.3degreesW) exhibit repeated centennial to millennial-scale oscillations during the late Holocene. Isotopic shifts of 0.2-0.3% over the past 5200 years represent changes in sea-surface temperature (SST) of 1.0-1.5degreesC or salinity variability of 1-2 psu. The largest significant isotopic events are centered at approximately 200, 2000, 3200, and prior to 4000 calendar years BP. High Florida Current delta(18)O during the Little Ice Age (LIA) correlates with published records of high d18O in the Sargasso Sea and low SST off the coast of west Africa. An interval of generally low delta(18)O in the Florida Straits from 1800 to 500 years BP is synchronous with the Medieval Warm Period off west Africa but leads low delta(18)O in the Sargasso Sea by several hundred years. Synchronous cooling across the subtropical gyre during the LIA is difficult to explain using interannual North Atlantic Oscillation patterns but may be consistent with the simulated effects of reduced solar irradiance. At frequencies between 1/1000 and 1/300 years during the Late Holocene, Florida Current delta(18)O is coherent with a published estimate of C-14 production rate. Radiocarbon production seems to lead delta(18)O at these frequencies, but uncertainty in the phase calculation precludes a clear lead-lag relationship. At frequencies lower than 1/300 years, Florida Current delta(18)O is coherent and in phase with atmospheric Delta(14)C. The coherence of Delta(14)C and delta(18)O at periods >1000 years implies oceanic circulation may play a role in modulating atmospheric radiocarbon on millennial timescales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据