4.6 Article

Generation of mature fat pads in vitro and in vivo utilizing 3-D long-term culture of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 300, 期 1, 页码 54-64

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.05.036

关键词

adipocyte; adipogenesis; adipose tissue engineering; extracellular matrix; fat; leptin; scaffold; unilocular; 3-D cell culture; 3T3-L1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue-inherent factors such as cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions are regarded to exert a potentially large impact on adipogenesis as well as on secretory functions of adipose tissue. However, an appropriate 3-D adipogenesis model useful for addressing such interactions is still lacking. In this study, using tissue-engineering techniques, we demonstrate for the first time the development of coherent fat pads consisting of unilocular signet-ring cells in vitro. The constructs were generated by differentiating 3T3-L1 preadipocytes on 3-D polymeric scaffolds for either 9, 21, or 35 days in vitro. Only long-term culture yielded uniform tissues histologically comparable to native fat. Light and scanning electron microscopy provided direct evidence of 3-D tissue coherence and cell-cell contact in a tissue context, which was in strong contrast to conventional 2-D monolayer culture. Further differences between the two culture systems included enhanced secretion of leptin in 3-D tissue culture and differences in laminin expression (mRNA and protein level). Increase of triglyceride content over culture time and mRNA expression of other adipocyte genes, such as PPARgamma and Glut-4, were found to be similar. Implantation of long-term differentiated tissue constructs in nude mice resulted in further development and maintenance of fat pads. The presented model system is suggested to contribute to a better understanding of adipose tissue development and function facilitating studies on tissue-inherent interactions in vitro and in vivo. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据