4.7 Article

The clinical value of tumor burden at diagnosis in Hodgkin lymphoma

期刊

CANCER
卷 101, 期 8, 页码 1824-1834

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20568

关键词

Hodgkin lymphoma; tumor burden; prognosis; staging; therapeutic planning

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. The authors investigated the clinical role of tumor burden (TB) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, relating this parameter to most of the current clinical and prognostic factors and to the best predictive multifactorial models. METHODS. The volume of TB at diagnosis was measured directly from the initial staging computed tomography scans in 351 patients who were treated on standard protocols. The mean patient age was 34.0 years +/- 16.4 years. Forty-six patients had clinical Stage I disease, 201 patients had Stage II disease, 64 patients had Stage III disease, and 40 patients had Stage IV disease. There were 146 symptomatic patients. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and time to treatment failure (TTF) were the time parameters evaluated in the multivariate analysis. Logistic regression was applied according to those who achieved or failed complete remission. RESULTS. The mean TB normalized to body surface area (rTB) was 137.8 cm(3)/m(2) +/- 124.7 cm(3)/m(2) (range, 1.9-694.5 cm(3)/m(2)). In multivariate analysis, rTB was the best predictor of TTF, DFS, and complete remission; the second best predictor of OS after patient age; and largely superior to all prognostic models analyzed. For the same stage and treatment, patients who were destined to clinical failure had an initial rTB 60-108% higher compared with the initial rTB in patients who achieved whereas differences in drug dose intensity were not significant. a cure, CONCLUSIONS. In the current study, it was found that the rTB, as a prognostic factor, was more effective than and was independent of hitherto used factors and scores. The rTB may be a tool for evaluating the curative potential of treatment combinations, allowing physicians and patients to make better therapeutic choices earlier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据