4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of antidepressants on GABAB receptor function and subunit expression in rat hippocampus

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 68, 期 8, 页码 1489-1495

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.07.027

关键词

GABA(B) receptors; hippocampus; antidepressants; GABA(B) receptor subunits

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laboratory and clinical studies suggest that depression is associated with changes in the hippocampus and that this brain region is a major target for antidepressant drugs. Given the data suggesting that GABA(B) receptor antagonists display antidepressant properties, the present study was undertaken to assess the effect of antidepressant administration on GABA(B) receptors in the rat hippocampus to determine whether changes in this regional receptor system may play a role in the response to these agents. Rats were administered (i.p.) the monoamine oxidase inhibitors tranylcypromine (10 mg/kg) or phenelzine (10 mg/kg), the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine (15 mg/kg), or fluoxetine (5 mg/kg), a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, once daily for seven consecutive days. Two hours following the last drug treatment the hippocampal tissue was prepared for defining the distribution and quantity of GABA(B) receptor subunits using in situ hybridization and for assessing GABA(B) receptor function by quantifying baclofen- stimulated [S-35] -GTP-gammaS binding. All of these antidepressants selectively increased the expression of the GABA(B(1b)) subunit in hippocampus, having no consistent effect on the expression of GABA(B(1b)) or GABA(B(2))- Moreover, except for fluoxetine, these treatments increased GABA(B) receptor function in this brain region. The results indicate that an enhancement in the production of hippocampal GABA(B(1a)) subunits may be a component of the response to antidepressants, supporting a possible role for this receptor in the symptoms of depression and the treatment of this condition. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据