4.4 Article

Value of immediate postoperative electrocardiogram to update risk stratification after major noncardiac surgery

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 94, 期 8, 页码 1017-1022

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.057

关键词

-

资金

  1. AHRQ HHS [R01-HS06753] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current consensus guidelines recommend postoperative electrocardiographic surveillance only in patients at relatively high risk of postoperative major cardiac complications, but the usefulness of electrocardiograms after major noncardiac surgery is unknown. We prospectively studied 3,570 patients who underwent major noncardiac procedures and had electrocardiograms performed in the recovery room. Rates of major cardiac complications (acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, ventricular fibrillation or primary cardiac arrest, and complete heart block) were higher in patients who had new postoperative electrocardiographic abnormalities consistent with ischemia (ST-T elevation or depression or T-wave abnormalities compatible with ischemia) compared with those without ischemia (6.7% vs 1.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis, after adjusting for pre- and intraoperative clinical data, indicated that the presence of ischemia on the immediate postoperative electrocardiogram was an independent predictor of major cardiac complications (odds ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 3.9, p < 0.01). When patients were stratified by a preoperative Revised Cardiac Risk Index, ischemia on the immediate postoperative electrocardiogram identified patients with a higher risk of major cardiac complications in low- and high-risk subsets (odds ratio 4.9, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 15 in lower risk patients; odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 3.7 in higher risk patients). We conclude that the immediate postoperative electrocardiogram is a valuable tool to adjust risk stratification, even in patients who have lower risks when undergoing noncardiac surgery. (C) 2004 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据