4.6 Article

Rac1 mediates collapse of microvilli on chemokine-activated T lymphocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 173, 期 8, 页码 4985-4993

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.8.4985

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lymphocytes circulate in the blood and upon chemokine activation rapidly bind, where needed, to microvasculature to mediate immune surveillance. Resorption of microvilli is an early morphological alteration induced by chemokines that facilitates lymphocyte emigration. However, the antecedent molecular mechanisms remain largely undefined. We demonstrate that Rac1 plays a fundamental role in chemokine-induced microvillar breakdown in human T lymphocytes: The supporting evidence includes: first, chemokine induces Rac1 activation within 5 s via a signaling pathway that involves Galpha(i). Second, constitutively active Rac1 mediates microvilli disintegration. Third, blocking Rac1 function by cell permeant C-terminal Trojan peptides corresponding to Rac1 (but not Rac2, Rho, or Cde42) blocks microvillar loss induced by the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha (SDF-1alpha). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the molecular mechanism of Rac1 action involves dephosphorylation-induced inactivation of the ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) family of actin regulators; such inactivation is known to detach the membrane from the underlying actin cytoskeleton, thereby facilitating disassembly of actin-based peripheral processes. Specifically, ERM dephosphorylation is induced by constitutively active Rac1 and stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha-induced ERM dephosphorylation is blocked by either the dominant negative Rac1 construct or by Rac1 C-terminal peptides. Importantly, the basic residues at the C terminus of Rac1 are critical to Rac1's participation in ERM dephosphorylation and in microvillar retraction. Together, these data elucidate new roles for Rac1 in early signal transduction and cytoskeletal rearrangement of T lymphocytes responding to chemokine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据