4.7 Article

Ascorbate protects against impaired arteriolar constriction in sepsis by inhibiting inducible nitric oxide synthase expression

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 1282-1289

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.06.025

关键词

microcirculation; oxidative stress; cecal ligation and puncture; mice; free radicals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compromised microvascular responsiveness is one of the key factors associated with mortality of septic patients. The present study addresses the mechanism of protection by ascorbate against impaired vasoconstriction in septic mice. Sepsis (i.e., cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) model) elevated both plasma protein carbonyl (i.e., an index of oxidative stress) and plasma nitrite/nitrate (NOx) levels, reduced baseline mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), and inhibited the MABP pressor response to angiotensin II (Ang II) at 6 h post-CLP. At the microvascular level, sepsis increased the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA level in cremaster muscle arterioles (18-25 mum diameter) at 3 h post-CLP, and impaired vasoconstriction to Ang II in these arterioles at 6 h post-CLP. At 24 h post-CLP, sepsis resulted in 9% survival. An intravenous bolus of ascorbate (200 mg/kg body wt) given 30 min prior to CLP prevented the protein carbonyl and NOx increases, partially restored the baseline arterial pressure, and completely protected against all arteriolar iNOS mRNA increases, arteriolar constriction hyporesponsiveness, and pressor response impairment. Survival increased to 65%. In septic mice, iNOS gene knockout resulted in protection of arteriolar constriction and pressor responses identical to that provided by ascorbate. Ascorbate bolus given 3 h post-CLP protected against the increase in plasma NOx concentration and against the pressor response impairment. We conclude that ascorbate may protect arteriolar vasoconstrictor responsiveness in sepsis by inhibiting excessive NO production. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据