4.2 Article

An in vitro assay for (1→6)-β-D-glucan synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

期刊

YEAST
卷 21, 期 13, 页码 1121-1131

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1156

关键词

yeast; beta-1,6-glucan; cell wall; kre mutants; in vitro assay; immunoassay; GTP; RHO1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

(1-->6)-beta-D-glucan is a key cell wall component of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. Many genes are known to affect the levels or structure of this glucan, but their roles and a molecular description of the synthesis of (1-->6)-beta-D-glucan remain to be established and a method to measure (1-->6)-beta-D-glucan synthase activity in vitro would provide an enabling tool. Here, conditions for the detection of in vitro synthesis of this polymer are described. Crude membrane preparations from S. cerevisiae were isolated, and incubated in the presence of UDPglucose and GTP. With anti-(1-->6)-beta-D-glucan-specific antibodies, a time-dependent increase in the amount of this glucan was demonstrated in a dot-blot assay, or through an inhibition enzyme immunoassay. Antibody specificity was validated by competition experiments using pustulan, a (1-->6)-beta-D-glucan, laminarin, a (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan, yeast mannan and glycogen. The identity of the reaction product was also demonstrated by its sensitivity to a recombinant (1-->6)-beta-D-glucanase. Extracts from mutants in 10 genes with a wide range of altered cell wall (1-->6)-beta-D-glucan levels were assayed for in vitro synthesis of the polymer. A strong correlation of in vitro synthase activity with in vivo glucan levels was found, providing genetic support for the specificity of the assay. The basis for the GTP-dependence of the synthase reaction was studied. Extracts from rho2, rho3, rho4 and rho5 null mutants had wild-type in vitro activity. In contrast, Rho1p overproduction led to increased in vitro synthesis, implicating Rho1p in the regulation of (1-->6)-beta-D-glucan synthesis. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据