4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Beta A versus beta B: is it merely a matter of expression?

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 225, 期 1-2, 页码 9-17

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2004.02.007

关键词

activin; TGF; structure; ovary; inhibin

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA09560] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [T32 AG00260] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [T32 HD007068, U54 HD041857] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [F32 GM65717] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activins are members of the transforming growth factor (TGF) beta (beta) superfamily of proteins that function in a wide array of physiological processes. Like other TGFbeta ligands, activins are biologically active as dimers. An activin molecule is comprised of two beta-subunits, of which four isoforms have been identified: betaA, betaB, betaC, and betaE. The most widely studied activins to date are activin A (betaA/betaA), activin B (betaB/betaB), and activin AB (betaA/betaB). Inhibin is a naturally occurring activin antagonist that consists of an a-subunit disulfide-linked to one of the activin P-subunits, producing inhibin A (alpha/betaA), or inhibin B (alpha/betaB). The development of assays distinguishing between different forms of activins and inhibins, along with knock-in and knock-out models, have provided evidence that the betaA- and betaB-subunits have independent and separate roles physiologically. Additionally, evaluation of ligand-receptor interactions indicates significant differences in receptor affinity between activin isoforms, as well as between inhibin isoforms. In this review we explore the differences between activin/inhibin betaA- and betaB-subunits, including expression patterns, binding properties, and the specific structural aspects of each. From the growing pool of knowledge regarding activins and inhibins, the emerging data support the hypothesis that betaA- and betaB-subunits are functionally differently. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据