4.8 Article

Loss of XIAP protein expression by RNAi and antisense approaches sensitizes cancer cells to functionally diverse chemotherapeutics

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 23, 期 49, 页码 8105-8117

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207967

关键词

XIAP; RNAi; antisense; apoptosis; IAPs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stable expression of short-hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) directed against the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) resulted in the generation of three MDA-MB-231 cell lines (XIAP shRNA cells) with reductions in XIAP mRNA and protein levels >85% relative to MDA-MB-231 cells stably transfected with the U6 RNA polymerase III promoter alone (U6 cells). This RNA interference (RNAi) approach dramatically sensitized these cells to killing by the (t) under bar umor necrosis factor-(r) under bar elated (a) under bar poptosis-(i) under bar nducing (l) under bar igand (TRAIL). Importantly, loss of XIAP also sensitized the cells to killing by taxanes but had no additional effects on killing by carboplatin and doxorubicin. The increased sensitivity of the XIAP shRNA cells to killing by TRAIL and taxanes correlated with enhanced caspase cleavage and activation, including caspase-8, and robust processing of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and BID compared to U6 cells. Additionally, increasing XIAP levels by adenovirus-mediated expression protected both XIAP shRNA and U6 cells from TRAIL killing in a dose-dependent manner. The effects observed by stable RNAi with respect to TRAIL sensitization were also achieved following downregulation of XIAP in Panc-1 cells treated with a second-generation, mixed-backbone antisense oligonucleotide, AEG 35156/GEM640. These data indicate that reducing XIAP protein expression by either RNAi or antisense approaches increases cancer cell susceptibility to functionally diverse chemotherapeutic agents and supports the notion that downregulation of XIAP in vivo may synergize with disease-relevant chemotherapeutic regimes, including TRAIL and taxanes, to increase the effectiveness of antineoplastic agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据