4.8 Article

Solar photocatalytic degradation of humic acids as a model of organic compounds of landfill leachate in pilot-plant experiments: Influence of inorganic salts

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 127-137

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.04.017

关键词

pholocatalytic degradation; biodegradability; inorganic matrix; humic acids; initial adsorption; pilot-plant experiments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humic acids (HA) are known to be present at a high concentration in leachates from mature and old landfills. In this work, the photocatalytic degradation of Aldrich-Sigma HA as a model of refractory organic of stabilised leachate was studied. The experiments were carried out in HA aqueous suspension of TiO2 (P-25) in CPC reactor at pilot-plant scale in the Plataforma Solar de Almeria (Spain) under solar irradiation and natural pH. The adequate quantity of catalyst for this process was found to be 0.7 g(1-1). The effect of inorganic ions, commonly present in real leachate such as HCO3-, SO42-, Cl- on photocatalytic degradation of HA was also studied. The ions examined, even in higher concentration for Cl- (4.5 g/l) and SO42- (7.75 g/l) were found to not affect the photocatalytic process and the similar efficiency of HA removal was ensured. However, the presence of hydrogen carbonate into solution matrix inhibited strongly the photocatalytic reaction. The catalytic oxidation of HA, in particular in the mixture of anions, did not agree with Langumir-Hinshelwood kinetics and the evaluation of results was expressed only as an effect of HA removal versus accumulated energy (Q(UV), kJ 1(-1)) by photoreactor. Moreover, the effect inorganic matrix on initial adsorption of HA has been discussed on the basis of the results obtained in laboratory batch test. Additionally, the biodegradability evolution during photodegradation of HA was evaluated in terms of biological oxygen demand (BOD5) as well as by oxygen uptake rate. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据