4.7 Article

Isotopic constraints on glacial/interglacial changes in the oceanic nitrogen budget

期刊

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2003GB002189

关键词

feedback; nitrogen isotopes; paleoceanography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the response of the N-15/N-14 of oceanic nitrate to glacial/interglacial changes in the N budget, using a geochemical box model of the oceanic N cycle that includes N-2 fixation and denitrification in the sediments and suboxic water column. This model allows us to quantify the isotopic response of different oceanic nitrate pools to deglacial increases in water column and sedimentary denitrification, given a range of possible feedbacks between nitrate concentration and N-2 fixation/denitrification. This response is compared to the available paleoceanographic data, which suggest an early deglacial maximum in nitrate N-15/N-14 in suboxic zones and no significant glacial-to-late Holocene change in global ocean nitrate N-15/N-14. Consistent with the work of Brandes and Devol [2002], we find that the steady state N-15/N-14 of oceanic nitrate is controlled primarily by the fraction of total denitrification that occurs in the water column. Therefore a deglacial peak in the ratio of water column-to-sediment denitrification, caused by either a strong feedback between water column denitrification and the N reservoir or by an increase in sediment denitrification due to sea level rise, can explain the observed deglacial N-15/N-14 maximum in sediments underlying water column denitrification zones. The total denitrification rate and the mean ocean nitrate concentration are also important determinants of steady state nitrate N-15/N-14. For this reason, modeling a realistic deglacial N-15/N-14 maximum further requires that the combined negative feedbacks from N-2 fixation and denitrification are relatively strong, and N losses are relatively small. Our results suggest that the glacial oceanic N inventory was at most 30% greater than today's and probably less than 10% greater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据