4.5 Article

A role for ERKII in synaptic pattern selectivity on the time-scale of minutes

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 2671-2680

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03725.x

关键词

ERKII; LTP; rat hippocampal slice; simulation; spaced stimuli; synaptic intracellular signalling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stimulus reinforcement strengthens learning. Intervals between reinforcement affect both the kind of learning that occurs and the amount of learning. Stimuli spaced by a few minutes result in more effective learning than when massed together. There are several synaptic correlates of repeated stimuli, such as different kinds of plasticity and the amplitude of synaptic change. Here we study the role of signalling pathways in the synapse on this selectivity for spaced stimuli. Using the in vitro hippocampal slice technique we monitored long-term potentiation (LTP) amplitude in CA1 for repeated 100-Hz, 1-s tetani. We observe the highest LTP levels when the inter-tetanus interval is 5-10 min. We tested biochemical activity in the slice following the same stimuli, and found that extracellular signal-regulated kinase type II (ERKII) but not CaMKII exhibits a peak at about 10 min. When calcium influx into the slice is buffered using AM-ester calcium dyes, amplitude of the physiological and biochemical response is reduced, but the timing is not shifted. We have previously used computer simulations of synaptic signalling to predict such temporal tuning from signalling pathways. In the current study we consider feedback and feedforward models that exhibit temporal tuning consistent with our experiments. We find that a model incorporating post-stimulus build-up of PKM zeta acting upstream of mitogen-activated protein kinase is sufficient to explain the observed temporal tuning. On the basis of these combined experimental and modelling results we propose that the dynamics of PKM activation and ERKII signalling may provide a mechanism for functionally important forms of synaptic pattern selectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据