4.5 Article

Allergen-induced proteolytic cleavage of annexin-1 and activation of cytosolic phospholipase A2 in the lungs of a mouse model of asthma

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 4, 期 11, 页码 3328-3334

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200400895

关键词

annexin-1; asthma; cytosolic phospholipase A(2); matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time; of flight; two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To identify proteins that might play an important role in allergen-induced asthma, we analyzed lung extracts prepared from allergen (ovalbumin)-challenged animals in a mouse model of this condition. The combination of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry revealed that annexin-1, a 37 kDa anti-inflammatory protein that inhibits the activity of cytosolic phospholipase A(2) (cPLA(2)), was down-regulated by allergen challenge in the lungs of ovalbumin-sensitized mice. Immunoblot analysis showed that this effect of ovalbumin challenge was attributable to proteolytic cleavage of annexin-1. The ovalbumin-induced degradation of annexin-1 was blocked by pretreatment of mice with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or with sodium selenite, both of which have previously been shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects in this asthma model. Ovalbumin challenge also both increased the expression of cPLA(2) in lung tissue and reduced the extent of the interaction between cPLA(2) and annexin-1, and these effects were inhibited by NAC or selenite. Moreover, the concentrations of cysteinyl leukotrienes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and of leukotriene B-4 in lung tissue were increased by ovalburnin challenge in a NAC- or selenite-sensitive manner. Together, these results suggest that allergen-induced oxidative stress results in proteolysis of annexin-1 and consequent up-regulation of cPLA(2) activity and leukotriene production in this mouse model of asthma, and that the anti-inflammatory effects of selenite may provide a basis for the development of new antiasthmatic drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据