4.4 Article

Stabilizing queueing networks with setups

期刊

MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 891-922

出版社

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/moor.1040.0102

关键词

setup delay; multiclass queueing networks; fluid models; stability; throughput; Kelly networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For multiclass queueing networks, dispatch policies govern the assignment of servers to the jobs they process. Production policies perform the analogous task for queueing networks whose servers are subject to switch-over delays or setups, a model we refer to as setup networks. It is well known that a poorly chosen dispatch policy may lead to instability of a multiclass queueing network, even when the traffic intensity at each station is less than one and the policy is nonidling. Not surprisingly, setup networks and production policies inherit these instability concerns. With this in mind, we define a family of sensible production policies that are adaptations of dispatch policies and restrict the frequency of setup performance. We provide a framework for proving the stability of a setup network operating under a sensible production policy. Central to this framework is the artificial fluid model of a setup network. The artificial fluid models presented are generalizations of standard fluid models of multiclass queueing networks; see, for example, Dai (1995). Unlike their standard fluid model counterparts, artificial fluid models do not arise directly from a limiting procedure on some discrete network process: hence the artificial qualifier. Nevertheless, stability of the artificial fluid model implies stability of the associated setup network, a connection paralleling the main result of Dai (1995). As an exercise in using the artificial fluid model framework for proving stability of setup networks, we investigate several production policies adapted from dispatch policies. One production policy of particular interest involves a modification of the first-in-first-out dispatch policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据