4.5 Article

Zonal and topographical differences in articular cartilage gene expression

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 1182-1187

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.03.001

关键词

articular cartilage; zonal separation; gene expression; tissue engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Articular cartilage is composed of phenotypically different zones. In young articular cartilage, there are only two distinct zones: superficial and growth. The zones have different mechanical properties and play specific roles within functional cartilage tissue. In small animal models, it is difficult to separate the zones quickly and efficiently using only a dissecting microscope. Surface abrasion is a method that has been developed to harvest cells from articular cartilage to produce highly purified samples in a simple, reproducible process. Using this harvesting technique, the superficial zone has been separated from the underlying growth zone. Superficial cells comprised approximately 4% of the total cells obtained. Superficial and growth zone chondrocytes from articular cartilage were analyzed using real-time RT-PCR. Expressed superficial zone protein was 3-fold greater in the superficial zone population than in the growth zone population (p < 0.01). This, along with histological evidence, indicates that surface abrasion is successful as a zonal separation technique. Additionally, type II collagen was expressed 8-fold more abundantly in the growth zone than in the superficial zone (p < 0.005). There was no difference in aggrecan expression between the two zones. Regional variations among the femoral groove and medial and lateral condyles were also examined. No significant variations in SZP, type II collagen, or aggrecan were found, which makes the pooling of zonal cells from different regions an acceptable option for tissue engineering studies. (C) 2004 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据