4.4 Article

Applications of tissue microarray technology in immunohistochemistry: A study on C-kit expression in small cell lung cancer

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 1347-1352

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.07.016

关键词

tissue microarray; small cell lung cancer; c-kit; immunohistochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue microarray technology allows the immediate evaluation of molecular profiles of numerous different tissues, with savings of money and time. It was created for rapid, large-scale molecular studies, and the main concern regarding its possible broad acceptance is that the analysis of tissue microarrays instead of whole tissue sections may lead to false negative or positive results because of tissue heterogeneity. In the present study, we analyzed in 54 small cell lung cancers, by immunohistochemistry, the expression of the antigen c-kit, which seems to be important in these neoplasms' tumorigenesis, and compared the staining obtained on whole sections with that of the corresponding tissue microarrays. Although e-kit expression of the whole sections agreed with that of the corresponding biopsies in many cases, the correlation between whole sections and all the companion nonlost single cores or their mean value turned out to be highly significant only if the 36 double negatives (ie, both whole sections and companion tissue microarrays negative) were included (P < 0.0001). In fact, if only cases positive to at least I of the tests (ie whole sections or corresponding tissue microarrays positive) were considered, the correlation was not significant (P = 0.055). Tissue microarrays showed a good specificity (94.2% for all single cores and 92.3% for their mean value) but a rather poor sensitivity (respectively, 69.4% and 71.4%). Moreover, a high percentage (13.4%) of cores was lost, and this loss was not random. To sum up, in our experience, tissue microarray technology cannot be a substitute for whole sections in clinical diagnosis of individual cases. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据