期刊
ACTA CLINICA BELGICA
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 358-360出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/acb.2004.051
关键词
anaphylaxis; CD63; chlorhexidine; latex; lubricant
We report on a severe allergic reaction during urethral catheterisation, initially erroneously attributed to natural rubber latex (NRL). However, the negative investigations for latex, the uneventful further applications of NRL, the positive skin test and basophil activation test for chlorhexidine strongly support diagnosis of chlorhexidine anaphylaxis. This case illustrates that it is not widely appreciated that innocent products such as urethral lubricants may elicit serious life-threatening reactions. Careful inspection of the medical records is once again re-emphasised to be mandatory in order to avert subsequent anaphylaxis.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据