4.6 Article

Scaling of superdomain bands in ferroelectric dots

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 98, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3571560

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/F004869/1, EP/H00307X/1]
  2. Department for Employment and Learning (DEL)
  3. EPSRC [EP/F004869/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F004869/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bundles of 90 degrees stripe domains have been observed to form into distinct groups, or bands, in mesoscale BaTiO3 single crystal dots. Vector piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) shows that each band region, when considered as a single entity, possesses a resolved polarization that lies approximately along the < 110 >(pseudocubic) direction; antiparallel alignment of this resultant polarization in adjacent bands means that these regions can be considered as 180 degrees superdomains. For dots with sidewall dimensions below similar to 2 mu m, Landau-Kittel like scaling in the width of these superdomains was observed, strongly suggesting that they form in response to lateral depolarizing fields. In larger dot structures, scaling laws break down. We have rationalized these observations by considering changes in the driving force for the adoption of equilibrium superdomain periodicities implied by Landau-Kittel-free energy models; we conclude that the formation of ordered bands of superdomains is a uniquely meso/nanoscale phenomenon. We also note that the superdomain bands found by PFM imaging in air contrast with the quadrant arrangements seen previously by Schilling et al. [Nano Lett., 9, 3359 (2009)] through transmission electron microscopy imaging in vacuum. The importance of the exact nature of the boundary conditions in determining the domain patterns that spontaneously form in nanostructures is therefore clearly implied. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3571560]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据